I read the fine print, and every card shows where its facts came from. Here is how a label becomes a card.
| Source | What it gives a card |
|---|---|
| CIR (Cosmetic Ingredient Review) safety assessments | Safety findings and how much industry reports using |
| SCCS opinions and the EU CosIng database | EU limits, restrictions and bans |
| PubChem | Chemistry: formula, molecular weight, identity |
| Kew's World Checklist of Vascular Plants | The correct botanical name for plant ingredients |
| EWG Skin Deep | One outside score, shown as theirs |
| The brand's own label | The ingredient list, in the brand's order |
No fact on a card is written by AI. If I cannot point to a source, it is not on the card.
The bars show the concentrations reported in CIR's newest use survey, split into leave-on and rinse-off products. “NR” means the survey gave no figure, and an older survey is never shown in its place. If the newest survey did not cover an ingredient at all, the bar shows the newest one that did, with its year. More in How much is in it?
Every month I check CIR's status list. When CIR reopens a review, the card shows “under review” in orange until the new report is final.
Every term on a card is defined in the glossary.